I mean , it's , it's , it is natural in a marriage for , for procreation to occur . It's not always going to happen in reality though , but that's still , that's still one of the natural functions of marriage and , and uh married couples who can't conceive Children . There are other ways to um be parents like adoption , for example , if they want to .
Well , I'm not , I'm not I wouldn't advocate a law that would prevent it . But would it change the definition of what their marriage is to you ? Because they don't want to have a family ?
The Joe Rogan experience , I think of marriage is a certain thing which is the , um , the context for , uh , for procreation , for the , for the , the building of the , the nuclear family . What about people that get married that don't have kids ? Are you opposed to that ?
There are other ways to um be parents like adoption , for example , if they want to . But if people want to be married and don't want to ever have Children , are you opposed to them being married ? Well , I'm not , I'm not I wouldn't advocate a law that would prevent it .
I , I think there is something wrong with that . II , I think it , it , there , there is something wrong with , you know , getting married and saying we're just , we , we don't , we're not gonna have any kids at all . But why is there something wrong with that ?
